Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Walker et al v. Cherokee County et al
as 1:2021cv00292
Plaintiff:
Kelly Walker, Kellly Campbell, J. S. and others
Defendant:
Cherokee County, Scott Lindsay, Cindy Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00474
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walker et al v. Stanforth et al
as 2:2017cv01037
Plaintiff:
Kellie Walker and Thomas Walker
Defendant:
Vernon P Stanforth, Matthew T. Weidman, Cameron Hines and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Newman v. The City of Quincy et al
as 3:2017cv03147
Plaintiff:
Ryan J Newman
Defendant:
The City of Quincy, Robert Copley, Kyle Hatch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estera Tamas, et al v. DSHS, et al
as 08-35862
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ESTERA L. TAMAS, RUTH S. TAMAS and MONICA ., by and through her court-appointed guardian for purposes of litigation
Defendant - Appellant:
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, STATE OF WASHINGTON, MARSCHELL BAKER, individually and in her official capacity acting under the color of state law, JOYCE DRAKE, individually and in her official capacity acting under the color of state law and others
Walker et al v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, et al.,
as 2:2007cv00740
Plaintiff:
Kelly Walker
Defendant:
Taser International, Inc., Andrew Cook, Jeremy Hendricks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tamas et al v. Monica et al
as 2:2007cv00750
Plaintiff:
Estera L Tamas, Estera L Tamas, Estera L Tamas and others
Defendant:
State of Washington Department of Social and Health Services, Marschell Baker, Joyce Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
