Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Leventhal v. Kenitz et al
as 2:2025cv00525
Petitioner:
Howard E Leventhal
Respondent:
Michael Kenitz, Christy Knowles and Jared Hoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Stevens, et al
as 24-1425
Defendant:
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, a statutory entity of the State of Colorado, MICHELLE TAYLOR, in official and individual capacities, ANGELA STEVENS, in official and individual capacities and others
Plaintiff:
EUGENE MARTINEZ
KENITZER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv05495
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY LEE KENITZER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Snorsky v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2018cv03025
Defendant:
S. Sturgeon, R. Neff, Roberts and others
Plaintiff:
John Standley Snorsky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv04115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
SEC v. Anthony Vassallo, et al
as 14-16647
Plaintiff - Appellee:
U.S. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY VASSALLO, KENNETH KENITZER and EQUITY INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AND TRADING, INC.
Real-party-in-interest - Appellant:
MICHAEL J. CALLAHAN
Receiver - Appellee:
STEPHEN E. ANDERSON, Receiver for Equity Investor Management and Training, Inc.
Ronald Lucero v. Stephen Mayberg, et al
as 13-15779
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD LUCERO
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN MAYBERG, CYNTHIA A. RADAVSKY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
William J Neufeld Jr v. Kenitz
as 2:2012cv07379
Respondent:
Lieutenant Kenitz
Petitioner:
William J Neufeld, Jr
Lucero v. Mayberg et al
as 2:2010cv02132
Plaintiff:
Ronald J. Lucero
Defendant:
Stephen Mayberg, Cynthia Radavsky, Matthew Cate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
