Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Singleton v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2022cv00940
Plaintiff:
Sterling L Singleton
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, Bryan P. Stirling, Dennis Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Flemming v. Drake et al
as 4:2019cv02850
Defendant:
Kennard Dubose, James Stoney Drake, Dr. Beverly A. Wood and others
Plaintiff:
James Michael Flemming
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Stirling et al
as 5:2019cv00938
Defendant:
Jane Doe 10, Charles Williams, Thiery Nettles and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Stirling et al
as 5:2019cv00435
Defendant:
Stanley Terry, Kennard Dubose, Joseph McFadden and others
Plaintiff:
Vincent Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rucker v. Stirling et al
as 1:2019cv00310
Defendant:
Stanley Terry, Kennard Dubose, Charles Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Rucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simmons v. Williams et al
as 0:2019cv00317
Defendant:
Michelle Chambers, Tim E. Rogers, Bryan P. Stirlings and others
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. Bryan P. Stirling et al
as 2:2019cv00313
Defendant:
Kennard Dubose, Charles Williams, Tim E. Rogers and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly Lewis Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Feaster v. Stirling et al
as 5:2019cv00296
Defendant:
Victoria Norman, Kennard Dubose, Charles Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Jason D Feaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smalls v. Williams et al
as 5:2019cv00079
Defendant:
Jennifer Franklin, Kelly, Michelle Chambers and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Smalls
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Stirling et al
as 0:2018cv03569
Defendant:
Jennifer Franklin, Willie F. Smith, Michelle Chambers and others
Plaintiff:
Lance Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
