Cases 1 - 10 of 1,137
Rogers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Kenneth H. Rogers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
ELLIS v. LEONARD et al
as 1:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JERMAINE ELLIS
Defendant:
C. LEONARD, RONNIE BEST, JAMES FURLOW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black v. Adolf et al
as 5:2024ct03112
Plaintiff:
Martinez Orlandis Black
Defendant:
Peter Adolf, Alan Ellis, Noell P. Tin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perrotti v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Perrotti
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
ELLIS v. GORDER
as 1:2024cv00371
Petitioner:
KENNETH JERMAINE ELLIS
Respondent:
R. VAN GORDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cromartie v. Reams et al
as 5:2024ct03098
Plaintiff:
Christopher D. Cromartie, Jr.
Defendant:
Ashston Reams, Susan Addams, Marcus Houis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Ali v. Sledge et al
as 5:2024ct03080
Plaintiff:
Abdulkadir Sharif Ali
Defendant:
Wendy Sledge, Kenneth Washington, William Riddick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. State
as 5:2024hc02074
Petitioner:
Kenneth Earl Cooper
Respondent:
State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
ARMSTRONG v. SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA et al
as 1:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
KENNETH ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
SUN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA and NCL CORPORATION LTD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
