Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Kenneth Bicking, III v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 25-14322
Petitioner:
KENNETH ALFRED BICKING, III
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Linville v. Jackson
as 2:2025cv01662
Petitioner:
Kenneth Alfred Linville, Jr
Respondent:
Robert Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Linville v. State of Washington
as 25-2066
Petitioner:
KENNETH ALFRED LINVILLE, JR.
Respondent:
STATE OF WASHINGTON
Linville v. State of Washington
as 3:2024cv05357
Petitioner:
Kenneth Alfred Linville, Jr
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Katz Durell, LLC v. John Doe 1 et al
as 1:2023cv04167
Plaintiff:
Katz Durell, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and Kenneth Alfred
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bicking v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2023cv00071
Petitioner:
Kenneth Alfred Bicking, III
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Linville v. Jackson
as 3:2022cv05241
Petitioner:
Kenneth Alfred Linville, Jr
Respondent:
Robert Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guenther v. BP Retirement
as 21-90015
Petitioner:
Michael Press, Victor Adams, BP Corporation North America, Incorporated and others
Respondent:
Les Owen, Fredric A. Guenther and Walton Fujimoto
Alfred v. Holder, Jr. et al
as 3:2014cv00088
Petitioner:
Kenneth Alfred
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Rand Beers, Jeh Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Concorde Equity II, LLC v. Kenneth Alfred Miller et al
as 3:2010cv01041
Plaintiff:
Concorde Equity II, LLC
Defendant:
Kenneth Alfred Miller , George Cresson , Loanvest XII, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
