Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Kenneth Liggins v. Zion Baptist Church
as 21-2369
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH D. LIGGINS
Defendant / Appellee:
ZION BAPTIST CHURCH, PASTOR KARLYLE HILL, DEACON STEVE WASHINGTON and others
Liggins v. Zion Baptist Church et al
as 5:2021cv00058
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Liggins
Defendant:
Zion Baptist Church, Pastor Karlyle Hill, Deacon Steve Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00620
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
LIGGINS v. G.A. & F.C. WAGMAN, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv02632
Plaintiff:
KENNETH D. LIGGINS
Defendant:
G.A. & F.C. WAGMAN, INC., WAGMAN HEAVY CIVILL, INC., RICH TURNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Liggins v. J. Holbert
as 17-1608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH D. LIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
J. MIKE HOLBERT, Board of Supervisor for Clarke County, KEITH R. DALTON, Berryville Town Manager, CLARKE COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, et al and others
Kenneth D. Liggins v. Robina R. Bouffault
as 14-2353
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH D. LIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBINA R. BOUFFAULT
Defendant:
CLARKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, et al, THOMAS JUDGE, JENNIFER WELLIVER and others
Liggins v. Mitchell et al
as 5:2012cv00131
Defendant:
Maria Hileman, Robert T. Mitchell, Jr., Danielle Nadler and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Liggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Liggins v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv08251
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Liggins
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Kenneth Liggins v. Robina Bouffault
as 11-1083
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH D. LIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBINA R. BOUFFAULT and CLARKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
Kenneth Liggins v. Robina Bouffault
as 10-2239
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH D. LIGGINS
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBINA R. BOUFFAULT and CLARKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
