Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Rook v. State of Washington Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2016cv05033
Plaintiff:
Guy Adam Rook
Defendant:
State of Washington Department of Corrections, Dan Pacholke, Steven Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Hampton Manufacturing Incorporated
as 2:2016cv00260
Plaintiff:
Joseph Neal
Defendant:
Hampton Manufacturing Incorporated, Ronald S Hampton, Sr., Washington State Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WINGATE INNS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. HOTEL SQUARED, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv04072
Plaintiff:
WINGATE INNS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Defendant:
HOTEL SQUARED, LLC, KENNETH E. MOORE and BIPIN B. PATEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Shore v. Warner et al
as 4:2015cv05044
Plaintiff:
Darren C Shore
Defendant:
Bernie Warner, Washington State Department of Corrections, G Steven Hammond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Newton et al
as 1:2014cv06473
Defendant:
Juner Cevallos and Dana Newton
646) 601-2857 (fax:
Kenneth E. Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Pinnock et al
as 1:2014cv05524
Petitioner:
Kenneth E. Moore
Respondent:
Deputy Newton and Sr. Parole Officer Pinnock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moore v. Pinnock et al
as 6:2014cv06446
Petitioner:
Kenneth E. Moore
Respondent:
Pinnock and Newton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Moore v. Peters et al
as 6:2013cv06271
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Moore
Defendant:
J. Peters, Reynolds, Caslin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Moore v. Raught, et al
as 10-56807
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH E. MOORE
Defendant - Appellee:
RAUGHT, Correctional Officer and PEMBERTON
Movant:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION
Kenneth E Moore v. Raught
as 2:2007cv03836
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E Moore
Defendant:
Raught
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
