Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Jones v. Rivello et al
as 1:2022cv00825
Petitioner:
Eric Kenneth Jones
Respondent:
John Rivello, Josh Shapiro and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JONES v. LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
as 2:2017cv01011
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JONES
Defendant:
LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Phillips v. Jones
as 3:2014cv02490
Plaintiff:
Matthew Phillips
Defendant:
Kenneth Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. PA State Attorney General et al
as 1:2013cv02526
Petitioner:
Eric Kenneth Jones
Respondent:
Vincent Mooney and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stolarik v. City of Wilkes Barre et al
as 3:2012cv01249
Plaintiff:
Paul S. Stolarik
Defendant:
City of Wilkes Barre, Edward Casella, Kenneth Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv01817
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 3
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. CBS CORP
as 2:2010cv69522
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JONES
Defendant:
CBS CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALLEN et al v. CBS CORP
as 2:2010cv61108
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL ALLEN, ROBERT BENJAMIN, SPRALLING CHARLES and others
Defendant:
CBS CORP and CBS CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
KRIL et al v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv00811
Plaintiff:
HELENE KRIL, HELENE KRIL, CAROLYN ODDO and others
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION, MCKESSON CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Admiral et al v. Hilton Scranton & Conference Center et al
as 3:2008cv00287
Plaintiff:
Sheena Admiral, Sheena Admiral, Pauline Barnwell and others
Defendant:
Hilton Scranton & Conference Center and Getaway Weekend Vacations, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Housing Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
