Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Darnell Kenneth Jones, Jr. v. Frank A. McGuire
as 2:2015cv09464
Petitioner:
Darnell Kenneth Jones, JR.
Respondent:
Frank A. McGuire
Cutler v. Eurekal County et al
as 3:2014cv00376
Plaintiff:
Robert Cutler
Defendant:
Eureka, County of and Kenneth Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones et al v. Wright Medical Group Incorporated et al
as 2:2013cv01694
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jones and Karen Jones
Defendant:
Wright Medical Group Incorporated , Wright Medical Technology Incorporated , Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Charles Kenneth Jones v. California Board of Parole Hearings
as 2:2012cv07376
Respondent:
California Board of Parole Hearings
Petitioner:
Charles Kenneth Jones
Nuttall v. Duch et al
as 2:2012cv00588
Plaintiff:
Daniel A Nuttall
Defendant:
Andy Duch, Bryan Flicker and Kenneth Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. U.M.C. Hospital et al
as 2:2009cv01785
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jones
Defendant:
U.M.C Hospital and Unknown Doctor(s)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Jones v. Michael J Astrue
as 5:2009cv01294
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jones
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue, Michael J Astrue and Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Type:
Social Security
Charles Jones v. F. Hawe
as 09-55636
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHARLES KENNETH JONES
Respondent - Appellee:
F. B. HAWES
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2009cv00710
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Helene Kril et al v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv06137
Plaintiff:
Lottie Bowman, Madeline Hall Brown, Richard Brown and others
Defendant:
DOES, McKesson Corporation and Smithkline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
