Cases 1 - 10 of 156
Taylor v. Carbullido, et al.
as 24-1417
Plaintiff:
KENNETH LEE TAYLOR
Defendant:
J. CARBULLIDO, CCI Counselor; CSP-Solano, C. HODGERS, CCI Counselor; CSP-Solano, RAFAEL PULIDO, CCI Counselor; CSP-Solano and others
Farr #305853 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv00765
Petitioner:
Kenneth Lee Farr
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kenneth Lee Armbruster v. D. Samual et al
as 2:2022cv08461
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Armbruster
Defendant:
D. Samual, California Mens Colony State Prison and Dr. Colter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Kootenai County Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 1:2022cv00338
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Watkins
Defendant:
Kootenai County Sheriff's Office, Robert B Norris and Brett A. Nelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watkins v. Eckstrom, et al.
as 1:2022cv00340
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Watkins
Defendant:
Deputy J. Eckstrom and John Does 1-6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Lee Stinchcomb v. Brian Birkholtz
as 2:2022cv05024
Petitioner:
Kenneth Lee Stinchcomb
Respondent:
Brian Birkholtz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Kenneth Lee Armbruster v. D. Samual et al
as 2:2022cv01630
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Armbruster
Defendant:
D. Samual, California Mens Colony State Prison and Colter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Kijakazi
as 3:2022cv00153
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 wc Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
USA v. Kenneth Hilbrant, Jr.
as 22-50001
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
KENNETH LEE HILBRANT, Jr.
(PC) Taylor v. Cassady et al
as 2:2021cv01584
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Taylor
Defendant:
Patricia Cassady, Eleanore Adams, Jill Klinge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
