Cases 11 - 20 of 61
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02749
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Washington v. Columbia County Sheriff's Offi
as 20-4144
Respondent:
Columbia County Sheriff's Office
Petitioner:
Kenneth Washington
Adams et al v. Sillen
as 4:2020cv08289
Plaintiff:
Harvey Rayburn, Darren Williams, Juan Meza and others
Defendant:
Robert Sillen
Abdulle et al v. Sillen et al
as 4:2020cv07065
Plaintiff:
Danny Dallas, Darren Williams, Bruce Koklich and others
Defendant:
Robert Sillen and John Clark Kelso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Columbia County Sheriff's Office
as 9:2020cv01094
Respondent:
Columbia County Sheriff's Office
Petitioner:
Kenneth Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WASHINGTON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv45013
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WASHINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Washington v. Vicaretti et al
as 9:2020cv00288
Defendant:
Dr. Vicaretti, Dr. Albright, Dr. Capacci and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washington v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Pinellas County)
as 8:2020cv00516
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Kenneth Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abdulle et al v. Sillen et al
as 4:2020cv00731
Plaintiff:
Danny Dallas, Darren Williams, Bruce Koklich and others
Defendant:
Robert Sillen and J. Clark Kelso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abdulle et al v. Sillen et al
as 4:2020cv00728
Plaintiff:
Danny Dallas, Darren Williams, Bruce Koklich and others
Defendant:
Robert Sillen and John Clark Kelso
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
