Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Halfacre v. Correct Care Solutions et al
as 5:2016cv00313
Plaintiff:
Kenny Halfacre
Defendant:
Correct Care Solutions , Jason Kelley and Rory Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenny Halfacre v. Arkansas Board of Correction, et al
as 15-3132
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenny Halfacre
Defendant - Appellee:
Arkansas Board of Correction, Randall Watson, Warden, ADC, Varner Unit, Raymond Naylor, Disciplnary Hearing Administrator, ADC, Central Office and others
Halfacre v. Kelley et al
as 5:2015cv00302
Plaintiff:
Kenny Halfacre
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley, Dale Reed, Grant Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Halfacre v. Arkansas Board of Correction et al
as 5:2014cv00429
Plaintiff:
Kenny Halfacre
Defendant:
Arkansas Board of Correction, Randall Watson, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Halfacre v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2014cv00191
Plaintiff:
Kenny Halfacre
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Ray Naylor, Keith Waddle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenny Halfacre v. Cheryl Jone
as 13-3025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenny Halfacre
Defendant - Appellee:
Cheryl V. Jones, Correctional Sergeant, Varner Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction
Halfacre v. Watson et al
as 5:2013cv00167
Plaintiff:
Kenny Halfacre
Defendant:
Randy Watson , Larry May , K Bolton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Halfacre v. Jones
as 5:2011cv00101
Plaintiff:
Kenny Halfacre
Defendant:
Cheryl V Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Halfacre v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2011cv00138
Plaintiff:
Kenny Halfacre
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenny Halfacre v. Larry Norris, et al
as 10-2564
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenny Halfacre
Defendant - Appellee:
Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Larry May, Assistant Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Ronald Dobbs, Assistant Director, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.