Cases 1 - 10 of 51
KERR v. USA
as 1:2024cv00263
Petitioner:
NORMAN ALAN KERR
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
KERR v. INGERSOLL-RAND INDUSTRIAL U.S., INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00961
Plaintiff:
ADAM KERR
Defendant:
INGERSOLL-RAND INDUSTRIAL U.S., INC., SATURN FREIGHT SYSTEMS, INC., A TIMELY DELIVERY SERVICE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Auto Negligence
KERR v. ROGERS, et al.
as 1:2023cv00929
Plaintiff:
ADAM GATES KERR
Defendant:
SHERIFF DANNY ROGERS, GUILFORD COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, OFFICER ATIF ABDELRAHMAN GAMAL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
KERR v. USA
as 1:2023cv00626
Petitioner:
NORMAN ALAN KERR
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Kerr v. Navy Federal
as 4:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
Corsheena A. Kerr
Defendant:
Navy Federal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hall v. Liles et al
as 5:2023cv00220
Plaintiff:
Ozie L. Hall, Jr.
Defendant:
Matthew L. Liles, James Steven Bass, Alexendra S. Schauss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mitchell v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Kyre Mitchell
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, Kerr Putney, Johnny Lee Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kerr v. Kelly
as 5:2022hc02203
Petitioner:
Corey Dewayne Kerr
Respondent:
L.B. Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mitchell v. The City of Charlotte, North Carolina et al
as 3:2022cv00574
Plaintiff:
Kyre Mitchell
Defendant:
The City of Charlotte, North Carolina, Kerr Putney, Johnny Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COVINGTON v. MARRIS et al
as 1:2022cv00673
Plaintiff:
MARCUS WAYNE COVINGTON
Defendant:
AMANDA MARRIS, KENDRA BLINN MONTGOMERY, ORLANDO F. HUDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
