Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Robinson v. Childes et al
as 3:2024cv01014
Plaintiff:
Willie Robinson
Defendant:
Kevin Childes, Jason Dunn and Wexford Health Source
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Childs v. Kwame Raoul
as 23-3281
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEVIN CHILDS
Respondent / Appellee:
CHERRYLE HINTHORNE, Warden and KWAME RAOUL
CHILDS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv20797
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CHILDS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Childs v. Hinthorne
as 1:2023cv01237
Petitioner:
Kevin Childs
Respondent:
Cheryl Hinthorne
Not Classified By Court:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pierre v. Hankoff et al
as 1:2023cv20330
Plaintiff:
Herns Mox Pierre
Defendant:
Officer Brian Hankoff, Officer Charles Travis and Officer Kevin Childs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
CHILDS v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2021cv05422
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CHILDS
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VANLOAN v. THE NATION OF ISLAM et al
as 2:2020cv06112
Defendant:
DAVID VALENTIN, VICTOR MOYAO, MICHELLE MONREAL and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN VANLOAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHILDS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv71835
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN CHILDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jane M. Murray v. City of Fountain Valley Police Sgt. Mike Parsons et al
as 8:2019cv00768
Defendant:
Chief Kevin Childes, Sgt. Mike Parsons and City of Fountain Valley
Plaintiff:
Jane M. Murray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jennifer Sherman v. Fountain Valley Police Department et al
as 8:2017cv02217
Defendant:
Kevin Childe, Does, Fountain Valley Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Sherman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
