Cases 1 - 10 of 89
Beckham v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02052
Petitioner:
Kevin Eugene Beckham, III
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BLAIR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv09533
Plaintiff:
KEVIN EUGENE BLAIR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00834
Petitioner:
Kevin E Smith and Kevin Eugene Smith
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kevin Dill v. United States
as 23-1801
Petitioner / Appellant:
Kevin Eugene Dill
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
ARMSTRONG v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04670
Plaintiff:
KEVIN EUGENE ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PACE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04109
Plaintiff:
KEVIN EUGENE PACE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MIKLES v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22158
Plaintiff:
KEVIN EUGENE MIKLES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Goodall v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
Kevin Eugene Goodall
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing and US Attorney-Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
GUNN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv07623
Plaintiff:
KEVIN EUGENE GUNN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Burton v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv05265
Plaintiff:
Kevin Burton and Kevin Eugene Burton
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
