Cases 1 - 10 of 40
STONE v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2023cv00468
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE STONE
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Hill v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2021cv00603
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Hill
Defendant:
Galipeau, Aramark Inc and IDOC Grievance Process Commissioner
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixie v. Daye
as 1:2021cv00285
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Dixie
Defendant:
Raquel C Daye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Gladieux
as 1:2018cv00331
Defendant:
David Gladieux
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DIXIE v. THE CHRISTIAN CENTER et al
as 1:2017cv04548
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE DIXIE
Defendant:
SHAWN FORD and THE CHRISTIAN CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Milletary v. Westville Correctional Facility
as 2:2017cv00246
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Milletary
Defendant:
Westville Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BROOKING v. LAWRENCE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2017cv00022
Miscellaneou:
BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE BROOKING
Defendant:
LAWRENCE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, TRAVIS SANDERS, UNKNOWN JAIL NURSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKING v. LAWRENCE COUNTTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2017cv00021
Defendant:
BEDFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOE DEWEESE, JUSTIN DODD and others
Miscellaneou:
BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE BROOKING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKING v. LAWRENCE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 3:2017cv00013
Defendant:
JOSEPH ADAMS, BEDFORD POLICE DEPARTMENT, MIKE BRANHAM and others
Miscellaneou:
BRANCHVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LEE BROOKING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GAYLES v. SMITH
as 2:2016cv00144
Petitioner:
KEVIN LEE GAYLES
Respondent:
BRIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
