Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Bordeaux v. Pahlke
as 3:2023cv03024
Plaintiff:
Kevin Wade Bordeaux
Defendant:
Zachery Pahlke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Wilson v. US District Court Clerk's Office
as 4:2023cv00690
Plaintiff:
Kevin Wade Wilson
Defendant:
US District Court Clerk's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
WADE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv57380
Plaintiff:
KEVIN WADE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WADE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv22037
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL KEVIN WADE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tyner v. Fremont County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2020cv03856
Defendant:
No Named Defendants, Fremont County Sheriff's Office, Fremont County Detention Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Tyner and Kevin Wade Tyner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLENDANIEL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv17193
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN WADE CLENDANIEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WADE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv54139
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN WADE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NELSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv24844
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN WADE NELSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WADE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv05743
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN WADE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
US v. Kevin Wade
as 19-7566
Defendant / Appellant:
KEVIN WADE
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
