Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Khan v. Canonical USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv00182
Plaintiff:
Ekbal Khan
Defendant:
Canonical USA, Inc., Michael Kress, Christopher Kenyon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Howlett v. Warren, City of et al
as 2:2017cv11260
Plaintiff:
DeSheila Howlett
Defendant:
Warren, City of, Lawrence Gardner, Shawn Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Khan v. John Doe Police Officers et al
as 2:2016cv12285
Plaintiff:
Khalid Khan
Defendant:
John Doe Police Officers and City of Detroit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Khan v. Regal Entertainment Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv01655
Plaintiff:
Momin Khan
Defendant:
Regal Entertainment Group, Inc. , Tennessee Security Services, L.L.C. and Mark Petty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2597
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Summers-Eskridge v. Kaschubeck et al
as 2:2011cv00442
Plaintiff:
J Laverne Summers-Eskridge
Defendant:
John Kaschubeck , Mohamed H Abib , Muhammad N Khan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowman et al v. Ballinger et al
as 2:2011cv12162
Plaintiff:
Lardell Bowman , LHB and April Parkhurst
Defendant:
Joseph Ballinger , Daniel Bozek , Michael Huddas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
J.Laverne Summers-Eskridge v. Kaschubeck et al
as 2:2008cv01126
Plaintiff:
J.Laverne Summers-Eskridge, J.Laverne Summers-Eskridge, J.Laverne Summers-Eskridge and others
Defendant:
John Kaschubeck, Mohamed H Abib, Muhammad N Khan and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv12356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
