Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Sabeehullah et al v. Fairlife LLC et al
as 2:2019cv00222
Defendant:
SUE McCLOSKEY, MIKE McCLOSKEY, FAIRLIFE, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MOHAMMAD SABEEHULLAH, NABIL KHAN, Kathryn Welsh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RIDDLE et al v. RYAN et al
as 1:2019cv01263
Plaintiff:
DAWN RIDDLE and MATT RIDDLE
Defendant:
SYED J KHAN, NICOLE M RYAN, RETA K BOWEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RooR International BV et al v. Falak Inc et al
as 3:2019cv00112
Plaintiff:
Sream Inc and RooR International BV
Defendant:
Muhammad Khan, Falak, Inc. d/b/a Smoke Shack and Falak Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Khan v. Martinez, et al
as 2:2017cv00354
Plaintiff:
Muhammed Khan
Defendant:
Sam Orlich, Jr , D. Hill , Paul Rosa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MANN v. APKER
as 2:2013cv00346
Defendant:
CRAIG APKER, GARY L. HENDERSON, RYAN JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBY JOE MANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
MANN et al v. BAILEY, et al.
as 2:2013cv00341
Defendant:
CRAIG APKER, BAILEY, BILILA and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBY JOE MANN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00254
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Savage v. Finney et al
as 2:2012cv00421
Plaintiff:
Virgil Savage
Defendant:
Leon Finney, Jr. , Georgette Finney , Woodlawn Comm Dev Corp The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
THOMPSON v. CONANT et al
as 1:2012cv01177
Defendant:
DR. CONANT, CATHORINE KEEFER, QAISIN KHAN and others
Plaintiff:
ROGER THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Savage v. Finney et al
as 2:2011cv00100
Plaintiff:
Virgil Savage
Defendant:
Dr Leon D Finney, Jr , Georgette Finney , Woodlawn Comm Dev Corp The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
