Cases 51 - 60 of 133
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00097
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
David Ketchum, Jr. v. Randy Khan, et al
as 17-1127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WAYNE KETCHUM, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDY KHAN, Michigan State Police Trooper, JOSEPH MCMILLAN, Michigan State Police Trooper, JESSICA WELTON, Michigan State Police Trooper and others
Khan v. Kingdom Energy Resources, LLC
as 6:2017cv00017
Plaintiff:
Sarah Khan
Defendant:
Kingdom Energy Resources, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dayton Superior Corporation v. Khan
as 3:2016cv00371
Plaintiff:
Dayton Superior Corporation
Defendant:
Imran Khan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Khan v. John Doe Police Officers et al
as 2:2016cv12285
Plaintiff:
Khalid Khan
Defendant:
John Doe Police Officers and City of Detroit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bismillah v. Mohr et al
as 3:2016cv01374
Plaintiff:
Bismillah
Defendant:
Gary C. Mohr, A. Bender, Ohio State University Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Khan v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2016cv11383
Plaintiff:
Anwar Khan, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Khan v. Director for DHS et al
as 1:2016cv00085
Petitioner:
Abdul Nadeem Khan
Respondent:
Director for DHS, Attorney General of the United States and Victoria Christian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Great Lakes Transportation Holding L.L.C., d/b/a Metro Cars v. Metro Car & Sedan et al
as 2:2015cv13774
Plaintiff:
Great Lakes Transportation Holding L.L.C.
Defendant:
Metro Car & Sedan, Javid Ahmed and Mohammed Khan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Khan v. Attorney General of the United States et al
as 1:2015cv02014
Petitioner:
Abdul Nadeem Khan
Respondent:
Attorney General of the United States and Victoria Christian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
