Cases 1 - 10 of 12
(PC) Courtney v. Kandel et al
as 2:2018cv02052
Defendant:
Dandra Roajof Moore, Khin Win, Pooja Kandel and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick K. Courtney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Errol Underwood v. Khin Win, et al
as 18-15944
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERROL LOVELL UNDERWOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
KHIN WIN, Doctor and Y. CHEN, Doctor
Liu v. New York State Department of H
as 18-964
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Xiao Qing Liu
Defendant - Appellee:
Matthew DeCagna, Doctor Abigail Hawkins, Doctor Sunil Penesti and others
Defendant:
William F. Ryan Community Health Center, NENA, Fedex Corporation, New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation and others
Allen Turk v. Ashley Pfile, et al
as 17-15733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLEN R. TURK
Defendant - Appellee:
ASHLEY PFILE, M.D. and KHIN WIN, M.D.
Johnson v. Arnold et al
as 2:2017cv00344
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Johnson
Defendant:
E. Arnold, Khin Win, Kuersten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Underwood v. Win
as 2:2016cv00346
Plaintiff:
Errol Underwood
Defendant:
Khin Win
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hemsley v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, et al.
as 2:2015cv01650
Plaintiff:
John Hemsley
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, State of California, G. Swarthout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. CDCR-CSP-Solano et al
as 2:2015cv01245
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Baker
Defendant:
CDCR-CSP-Solano, Eric Arnold, Mulligan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. CDCR-CSP-Solano et al
as 5:2015cv02038
Plaintiff:
Anthony Elmer Baker
Defendant:
CDCR-CSP-Solano, Eric Arnold, Mulligan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Turk et al
as 2:2014at01165
Plaintiff:
Allen R. Turk
Defendant:
Ashley Pfile and Khin Win
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
