Cases
Edward Plotzker v. Royce Lamberth We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-2211
Plaintiff - Appellant: EDWARD D. PLOTZKER, M.D.
Defendant - Appellee: ROYCE C. LAMBERTH, Chief United States District Court Judge for the District of Columbia, AMERICAN BOARD OF UROLOGY, Incorporated, KIRKLAND & ELLIS, LLP and others
Adelphia Recovery Trust v. Prestige Communications of NC, Inc. et al
as 1:2009mi00345
Plaintiff: Adelphia Recovery Trust
Defendant: Prestige Communications of NC, Inc., Jonathan J. Oscher, Lorraine Oscher McClain and others
Movant: Kilpatrick Stockton LLP
Cause Of Action: FRCP 45(b) Motion to quash or modify subpoena
Plotzker v. Lamberth et al
as 3:2008cv00027
Plaintiff: Edward D. Plotzker
Defendant: Royce C. Lamberth, American Board of Urology, Inc., Kirkland & Ellis, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Iguana, LLC v. Lanham et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2008cv00009
Plaintiff: Iguana, LLC
Defendant: Paul E. Lanham, Charles W. Calkins, Kilpatrick Stockton, LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plotzker v. Lamberth et al
as 1:2007cv08101
Plaintiff: Edward Plotzker
Defendant: Royce Lamberth, Nancy Mayer-Whittington, Mark Langer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Collins & Aikman Floor Coverings, Inc. et al v. Interface, Inc.
as 4:2005cv00133
Special Master: Carlos A Gonzalez
Plaintiff: Collins & Aikman Floor Coverings, Inc., Mohawk Industries, Inc., Mohawk Brands, Inc. and others
Defendant: Interface, Inc.
Consolidated Defendant: Aladdin Manufacturing Corporation, Mohawk Carpet Corporation and Mohawk Commercial, Inc.
Respondent: David Oakey and Kilpatrick Stockton LLP.
Petitioner: Sydney Daniel and David Oakley Designs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?