Cases 1 - 10 of 3,902
Stacia Hall, et al v. District of Columbia Board of Elections
as 24-7065
Plaintiff:
Stacia Hall, Ralph Chittams, Suzzanne Keller and others
Defendant:
District of Columbia Board of Elections
Ortez Reyes v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2024cv00711
Plaintiff:
Fredis Ruben Ortez Reyes
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, USCIS Director Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Associate Director Ted H Kim and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Starling v. American Select Partners, LLC
as 3:2024cv01035
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Starling
Defendant:
American Select Partners, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Crespo v. Carvajal
as 24-1138
Plaintiff:
DAVID CRESPO, ANTHONY PODIAS, PEDRO ESPADA, JR. and others
Intervenor:
CHENSHIN CHAN and DAVID NAGY
Defendant:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, Northeast Regional Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, WARDEN HERMAN QUAY, III, Former Warden, MDC Brooklyn, KIMBERLY ASK-CARLSON, Former Warden, MDC Brooklyn and others
Enedina Ramirez-Lopez, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 24-11249
Petitioner:
ENEDINA LISET RAMIREZ-LOPEZ and KIMBERLY MAYDALY CHAVEZ-RAMIREZ
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
May v. O'Malley
as 24-2568
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY JOANN MAY
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Stacia Hall, et al v. District of Columbia Board of Elections
as 24-7050
Plaintiff:
Stacia Hall, Ralph Chittams, Suzzanne Keller and others
Defendant:
District of Columbia Board of Elections
Gallatin v. McGrath RentCorp et al
as 1:2024cv02960
Plaintiff:
David Gallatin
Defendant:
McGrath RentCorp, Joseph F. Hanna, Nicolas C. Anderson and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
