Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Rogers v. Howard et al
as 3:2023cv05806
Plaintiff:
Daryl C Rogers
Defendant:
Timothy Howard, James Jolly, Aaron Arias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2023cv01326
Plaintiff:
Matt Wright
Defendant:
State of Washington, Washington State Department of Corrections, Christine Gomes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Howard et al
as 3:2021cv05311
Plaintiff:
Daryl Rogers
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Fithian, Lystad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinnon v. Nikula et al
as 3:2020cv05367
Defendant:
Dennis Dahne, Rehak, Henry and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur McKinnon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Massey v. Pierce County Sheriffs Department et al
as 3:2019cv05421
Defendant:
Kimberly Dawn Klemme and Pierce County Sheriffs Department
Plaintiff:
Lori Anna Massey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tillisy v. Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv05695
Defendant:
Dept of Corrections, K. Gabrielle Gaspar, Kevin Bovenkamp and others
Plaintiff:
Muhammed Tillisy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marks-Klemme v. Holland America Line N.V. et al
as 2:2018cv00420
Plaintiff:
Helen Marks-Klemme
Defendant:
Holland America Line N.V., Hal Antillen N.V., Holland America Line, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grenning v. Klemme et al
as 2:2012cv00600
Plaintiff:
Neil Grenning
Defendant:
Risa Klemme, Craig D Harrington, Jack Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cardenas v. Miller-Stout et al
as 2:2011cv05117
Plaintiff:
Leopold Cardenas
Defendant:
Maggie Miller-Stout, Harold Clarke, Duenich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canell v. Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv03054
Plaintiff:
Alvin H Canell
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Sara Deveny, Kely West and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
