Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Casanova v. Willow Bend Mortgage Company et al
as 3:2024cv00841
Plaintiff:
Neisy Casanova
Defendant:
Willow Bend Mortgage Company, Craig Schrank, National City Mortgage Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Amuneke-Nze v. USAA et al
as 1:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
Uchechi Amuneke-Nze
Defendant:
USAA and Sarah M. Kline
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv00606
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00870
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Vierling et al v. Kline et al
as 1:2015cv00243
Plaintiff:
Kerri L. Vierling and Larry M. Vierling
Defendant:
Robert F. Kline, Jackson County, Mississippi, Mike Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brackens v. Social Service of Aurora, Colorado et al
as 4:2014cv00692
Plaintiff:
Stacey Warren Brackens
Defendant:
Social Service of Aurora, Colorado, Social Service of Florida DFC, Lower Keys Medical Center Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Hale et al
as 3:2013cv00813
Defendant:
Chris Carroway and Marcus Hale
Interested Party:
William Kline
Plaintiff:
Edward Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00297
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00198
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00612
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
