Cases 31 - 40 of 93
Cobbs v. Wong et al
as 1:2017cv01702
Defendant:
Pablo Chun Yu Wong, Lucky Dog Nets DI-MBI Leasing Series LLC, Century 21 and others
Plaintiff:
Calvin Ray Cobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DOE v. MCCAULEY et al
as 1:2016cv03397
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
STEPHANIE GRAVES-WILLIAMS, KNIGHT, BRUCE LEMMON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HERITAGE OPERATIONS GROUP, llc et al v. Norwood
as 1:2016cv10614
Plaintiff:
Heritage Operations Group, LLC , Heritage Manor, Danville, llc , Heritage Manor- El Paso, LLC and others
Defendant:
Felicia F. Norwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Rowsey v. City of Milwaukee et al
as 2:2016cv01469
Plaintiff:
Rodney Rowsey
Defendant:
City of Milwaukee, Jason Mucha, Michael Vagnini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SIMONS v. HINSHAW et al
as 1:2016cv02704
Defendant:
JEFFREY HINSHAW and WENDY KNIGHT
Plaintiff:
CLARA SIMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Silas v. Watson et al
as 1:2016cv08349
Plaintiff:
Carlton Silas
Defendant:
Graylin Watson, Andrew Neberieza, Aisha Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meryl Squires-Cannon v. Forest Preserve District of C, et al
as 16-3118
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MERYL SQUIRES-CANNON
Defendant - Appellee:
FOREST PRESERVE DISTRICT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, DENNIS WHITE, ERIC HILDEBRANDT and others
Bargo v. Porter County Indiana et al
as 2:2016cv00177
Plaintiff:
Michael E Bargo, Jr
Defendant:
Porter County Indiana, Vicki Urbanik, Elizabeth A Knight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero v. Jaspar et al
as 3:2016cv50057
Plaintiff:
Robert Anthony Romero
Defendant:
Robert Jaspar, Shawn Knight, Dennis Christen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KNIGHT v. ALLEN
as 4:2016cv00034
Defendant:
MICHAEL ALLEN
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN A. KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
