Cases 11 - 15 of 15
Stanbrough et al v. Georgia-Pacific Gypsum, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv08303
Defendant:
Does, Georgia-Pacific Gypsum, LLC, Koch Industries, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Farden and Walter Stanbrough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
The Association of Public Agen, et al v. BPA
as 08-74725
Petitioner:
THE ASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC AGENCY CUSTOMERS, an unincorporated ad hoc organization, J.R. SIMPLOT COMPANY, a privately held firm, LONGVIEW FIBRE PAPER AND PACKAGING, INC., a Washington corporation and others
Intervenor:
ALCOA INC.
Respondent:
BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION
Consolidation Coal Company v. 3M Company, et al
as 5:2008cv00463
Defendant:
Veolia Environmental Services Waste-to-Energy, Integrated Electrical Services, Inc., Duke Energy Progress, LLC and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Johnson/Kerner Liaison Group
Special Master:
David O Ledbetter
3Rd Party Defendant:
The North Carolina Granite Corporation, FABRI-KAL Corporation, The National Lime and Stone Company and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Petitioner:
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Cross Defendant:
Electric Equipment Corporation of Virginia, Cooper Tire & Rubber Company and Huntington Ingalls Incorporated.
Plaintiff:
Consolidation Coal Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607
In Re: Sulfuric Acid, et al v. EI du Pont, et al
as 1:2003cv04576
In_re:
Sulfuric Acid Antitrust Litigation
Defendant:
E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, Inc. , Falconbridge Ltd. , Noranda, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Ohio Chemical Services , Independent Chemical Corp , National Alum Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McMurrain, et al v. Creslenn Oil Company, et al
as 1:2002cv01048
Defendant:
Urbana Well Servicing Company, Inc., EMCO Oil Company, Pan-Am Southern Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Johnson, R J McHenry, C B Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
