Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Negrete v. Koppers, Inc.
as 4:2023cv03409
Plaintiff:
Antonio Negrete
Defendant:
Koppers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2023cv03405
Plaintiff:
Antonio Negrete and Incorrectly Filed
Defendant:
Koppers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Brown v. Bossier et al
as 2:2018cv04400
Plaintiff:
Gregory Brown
Defendant:
Albert L Bossier, Jr , J Melton Garrett , Huntington Ingalls Incorporated and others
Cross_claimant:
Union Carbide Coporation , Albert L Bossier, Jr and J Melton Garrett
Cross_defendant:
Claims Resolution Management Corporation and John Deere Construction & Forestry Company
Third_party_plaintiff:
Albert L Bossier, Jr and J Melton Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Beck, et al v. Koppers Industries,, et al
as 3:2003cv00060
Plaintiff:
Talicia McNeal , Michelle Topps , Alice Hill and others
Defendant:
Koppers Industries, Inc. , Beazer East, Inc. , Illinois Central Railroad Company and others
Consol_plaintiff:
Andre Francis Ducote
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
IN RE: Koppers, Inc.
as 09-60127
Petitioner:
In re: KOPPERS INC, formerly known as Koppers Industries Inc, BEAZER EAST INC and ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD CO
Respondent:
KAY HOBBS
Plaintiff - Respondent:
WALTER HOBBS, DAVID HILL, ALICE HILL and others
Beck, et al v. Koppers Inc, et al
as 09-5
Plaintiff - Respondent:
KAY HOBBS, WALTER HOBBS, DAVID HILL and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
KOPPERS INC, formerly known as Koppers Industries Inc, BEAZER EAST INC and ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD CO
Beck v. Koppers Industries
as 06-60708
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
KENESHA L BARNES, On Behalf of the Estate of Sherrie Barnes, deceased
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
KOPPERS INC
Amicus Curiae:
MISSISSIPPI MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION
:
STATE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
