Cases 1 - 10 of 10
William Cummings v. Thomas McGinley, et al
as 24-1082
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BRANDON CUMMINGS
Defendant:
THOMAS S. MCGINLEY, Deputy Superintendent, CHRISTOPHER SYMONS, Deputy Superintendent, C.O. LUKE ERDMAN and others
Cummings v. McGinley et al
as 1:2023cv00937
Plaintiff:
William Cummings
Defendant:
Thomas McGinley, Christopher Symons, C.O. Luke Erdman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Bayside Associates v. Kreamer Feed
as 4:2018cv02121
Counter Plaintiff:
Kreamer Feed
Plaintiff:
Bayside Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kreamer v. Grant Production Testing Services Inc.
as 4:2015cv01075
Plaintiff:
Matthew Kreamer
Defendant:
Grant Production Testing Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Timothy Kreamer v. Mooney, et al
as 12-1440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY MAYNARD KREAMER
Defendant - Appellee:
MOONEY, PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PA PROBATION DEPARTMENT and others
Kreamer v. Mooney et al
as 3:2011cv01976
Petitioner:
Timothy Maynard Kreamer
Respondent:
Mooney, Walsh, PA Dept. of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FERNDANDEZ v. KREAMER
as 2:2011cv04632
Plaintiff:
JEANNALDO FERNDANDEZ
Defendant:
JEREMIAH KREAMER, YOHAN A. RAMIREZ HERRERA, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMIREZ HERRERA v. KREAMER et al
as 2:2011cv04533
Plaintiff:
YOHAN A. RAMIREZ HERRERA
Defendant:
JEREMIAH KREAMER, JOHN DOES 1-10 and ABC COMPANY 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOLZWORTH v. MOORE
as 2:2009cv05085
Plaintiff:
BRIAN HOLZWORTH
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TERRANCE MOORE, JEFFREY TOMLINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEE et al v. NUTTER et al
as 2:2009cv04945
Plaintiff:
WADE D. LEE and TANEIDA P. LEE
Defendant:
MICHAEL NUTTER, ANNE MARIE AMBROSE, ESTELLE B. RICHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
