Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Pinney v. Bridgewater State Hospital, et al
as 23-2077
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN PINNEY, a/k/a Gitapushy Val Angel
Defendant:
BRIDGEWATER STATE HOSPITAL, DR. NIKHIL MATHEWS, CITY OF BOSTON and others
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, SUMBUL SIDDIQUI, Mayor, CHRISTINE ELOW and others
Perkins v. Heisecke et al
as 3:2019cv30084
Plaintiff:
John Perkins
Defendant:
Ragha Vendra Kulkarni, Timothy Mahoney, William Buckenroth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-1554
Claimant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Crawford v. Wolverine Proctor & Schwartz,, et al
as 10-2230
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PETER A. CRAWFORD
Defendant - Appellee:
WOLVERINE PROCTOR & SCHWARTZ, INC., STEVEN F. CHILINSKI and DEEPAK S. KULKARNI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-1068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv11101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv11102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Crawford v. Wolverine Proctor & Schwartz, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv10048
Plaintiff:
Peter A. Crawford
Defendant:
Wolverine Proctor & Schwartz, Inc., Wolverine, Protor & Schwartz, Ltd., Phoenix UK, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv10279
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
