Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ingram et al v. Mouser et al
as 1:2019cv00308
Plaintiff:
Felisha Ingram, Dustin Ingram, Z. I. and others
Defendant:
Katie Mouser, St. Lukes, Does 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2013cv05444
Plaintiff:
Michael J Collins
Defendant:
State of Washington , State of Washington Department of L&I , Maria I Mcbride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dorothy Hartman v. Bank of New York Mellon, et al
as 13-2370
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOROTHY M. HARTMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Alternative Loan Trust 2005-86CB, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2005-86CB, FKA Bank of New York and CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, Penna, Utilities, Zoning, L&I, Property Assessment, EMS, Water Revenue, Records and Streets Dept., et al.
HARTMAN v. BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON et al
as 2:2013cv01909
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY HARTMAN
Defendant:
BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2005-86CB, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES SERIES 2005-86CB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv05259
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-35034
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
BALLARD v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv07926
Plaintiff:
GEORGE HENRY BALLARD, III
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, WATER DEPT., REVENUE DEPT. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Redmon v. Zavaras et al
as 1:2009cv02133
Plaintiff:
Matthew Tazio Redmon
Defendant:
Aristedes (I) Zavaras, Aristedes Zavaras, Pamela (I) J. Ploughe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
