Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Bush et al v. Alabama Department of Human Resources et al
as 2:2023cv00673
Plaintiff:
Adam Bush, Delsea Creel, L. C. and others
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Human Resources, Nancy Buckner, Dan Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dodson v. Fuller et al
as 2:2019cv00819
Plaintiff:
Marva L. Dodson
Defendant:
Roberta Fuller, Lawrence Webster, Willie Michael George, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681
Taylor v. Coty Inc et al
as 1:2018cv00070
Plaintiff:
Tara Taylor
Defendant:
Coty Inc. , Proctor & Gamble Co Inc , Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Cedeno v. Greyhound Lines Inc et al
as 2:2013cv00597
Plaintiff:
Pablo Cedeno
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines Inc and L C Coty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Suttles v. Thomas et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2011cv00477
Plaintiff:
Sonie Suttles
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Jeffrey Williams, Phyllis Billups and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams et al v. Macon County Greyhound Park, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00125
Plaintiff:
Lafayette Adams , Thomas Adams , Jacqueline Alexander and others
Defendant:
Bally Gaming, Inc. , Cadillac Jack, Inc. , IGT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Price v. Giles et al
as 7:2010cv03285
Petitioner:
Mardrecus Lamont Price
Respondent:
L. C. Giles and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
C. L. C. v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 7:2010cv02444
Plaintiff:
C. L. C., Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
