Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Jackson v. U.S. Solicitor General Elain Kagain, Ex-Rel. All
as 1:2011cv00058
Plaintiff:
Ira L. Jackson
Defendant:
U.S. Solicitor General Elain Kagain, Ex-Rel. All
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Fieldman Kieffer
as 10-5300
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ira L. Jackson, representing self medical watch complaint #5015662
Defendant - Appellee:
Fieldman Kieffer, Attorney at Law, James E. Eagan, for defendant, Martin Cohen, M.D., Surgeon for Westchester N.Y. Center, in their own official capacity and others
Jackson v. Conway
as 10-3811
Petitioner - Appellant:
Constantinee L. Jackson
Respondent - Appellee:
J. Conway, Superintendent
Jackson v. Fieldman Kieffer, LLP et al
as 1:2010cv06697
Plaintiff:
Ira L. Jackson
Defendant:
Fieldman Kieffer, LLP, James E. Eagan Esq., Martin Cohen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. Conway
as 9:2009cv01137
Petitioner:
Constantinee L. Jackson
Respondent:
James T. Conway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Conway
as 9:2009cv00728
Petitioner:
Constantinee L. Jackson
Respondent:
J. Conway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Curia et al
as 6:2009cv06193
Plaintiff:
Adrian L. Jackson
Defendant:
Tara Curia, Michael T. Allen and Livingston County Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Onondaga County et al
as 5:2008cv00505
Plaintiff:
Constantinee L. Jackson
Defendant:
Onondaga County, City of Syracuse, J.J. Brunetti and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jackson v. Fennessy
as 9:2008cv00243
Petitioner:
Troy L. Jackson
Respondent:
Susan Fennessy
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jackson v. Bush et al
as 3:2007cv01332
Plaintiff:
Ira L. Jackson
Defendant:
George W. Bush, Hillary Rodham Clinton and United States Federal Administrative Branch of Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
