Cases 1 - 10 of 15
King v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2022pq02061
Plaintiff:
Junior O. King and Tracy L. King
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
King et al v. Dart et al
as 1:2020cv04195
Plaintiff:
Devontae Honey, Joseph Wilkins and Howard L. King
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Supertendent Div 2, Sergent Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv07898
Defendant:
L. King, Star No. 20297, Francisco Mendoza Star No. 8138, Nathan Poole, Star No. 20545 and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06778
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Branden King v. United States of America
as 2:2015cv02224
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Branden L King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
King v. AbbVie, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv08917
Plaintiff:
Robert L. King
Defendant:
AbbVie, Inc. and Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hornik et al v. King et al
as 1:2013cv08892
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Hornik and Ronald Hornik
Defendant:
Ayeisha L King and State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. United States of America
as 2:2012cv02256
Petitioner:
Branden L King
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
The Bank of New York Mellon v. King et al
as 1:2011cv06319
Plaintiff:
The Bank of New York Mellon
Defendant:
Cordell L. King, Tara E King, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
