Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Stephen Cook v. Preston Marshall
as 19-30200
Defendant / Appellant:
PRESTON L. MARSHALL, In his capacity as Co-Trustee of Peroxisome Trust
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DOCTOR STEPHEN D. COOK, In his capacity as Co-Trustee of Marshall Heritage Foundation
USA v. Jabari Marshall
as 19-15189
Defendant / Appellant:
JABARI L. MARSHALL
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Samuel Marshall v. Warden, et al
as 19-10146
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA
Petitioner / Appellant:
SAMUEL L. MARSHALL
Estate of Richard L. Marshall, et al v. CIR
as 17-72960
Petitioner - Appellant:
ESTATE OF RICHARD L. MARSHALL, DECEASED, Patsy L. Marshall, Personal Representative and PATSY L. MARSHALL
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
United States v. Melinda L. Marshall
as 15-3083
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Melinda L. Marshall
Connecticut v. Marshall
as 3:2015r00002
Plaintiff:
State of Connecticut
Defendant:
Kerry L. Marshall
A & B Campbell Family et al v. Chesakpeake Energy Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00340
Plaintiff:
A & B Campbell Family , Eugene J Barrett, Jr. , Lori R Barrett and others
Defendant:
Chesakpeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Appalachia,L.L.C., Chesapeake Energy Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
United States of America v. Marshall
as 14-3424
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Kerry L. Marshall
USA v. Jabari Marshall
as 14-10195
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JABARI L. MARSHALL
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Marshall et al
as 1:2013cv03032
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Paul Marshall , Bridge Securities, LLC , Bridge Equity, Inc. and others
Garnishee:
Regions Bank
Intervenor_defendant:
Robin L Marshall
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
