Cases 1 - 10 of 12
SANTIAGO v. ATLANTIC CARE HOSPITAL OF NEW JERSEY
as 1:2021cv17042
Plaintiff:
JOSE L. SANTIAGO
Defendant:
ATLANTIC CARE HOSPITAL OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEWSOME et al v. BURD et al
as 5:2019cv00388
Defendant:
BRIAN CONNAUGHTON, BRIAN BURD, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE NEWSOME and BECKY LIBERTI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SANTIAGO v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2016cv04874
Plaintiff:
MYRNA L. SANTIAGO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
HOOKS v. PIERCE et al
as 1:2016cv03300
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE D HOOKS
Defendant:
RICK PIERCE, ELLIOT HERNANDEZ and L SANTIAGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OLIVER v. MAIN et al
as 2:2014cv01334
Petitioner:
LORENZO OLIVER
Respondent:
MERREL MAIN and ANGEL L. SANTIAGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
OLIVER v. SANTIAGO et al
as 2:2014cv01157
Petitioner:
LORENZO OLIVER
Respondent:
ANGEL L. SANTIAGO and MERREL MAIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GROHS v. FRATALONE, ET AL
as 2:2013cv07870
Plaintiff:
STEVEN GROHS
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER HOLMES, ANGEL L. SANTIAGO, ROBERT BUECHELE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2013cv05842
Plaintiff:
IAN SMITH
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and L. SANTIAGO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSS v. SANTIAGO
as 2:2013cv04058
Petitioner:
LORENZO ROSS
Respondent:
ANGEL L. SANTIAGO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MARQUEZ v. SANTIAGO et al
as 1:2013cv03926
Petitioner:
ANGELO MARQUEZ
Respondent:
ANGEL L. SANTIAGO and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
