Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Simpson v. Woodford County Jail
as 5:2021cv00161
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Simpson
Defendant:
Woodford County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Simpson v. Louisville Metro Government et al
as 3:2019cv00629
Plaintiff:
Shayla L Simpson
Defendant:
Mark Bolton, Officer Joy L. Wilson, Officer Ladawn M. Krantz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv
Simpson v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv00526
Plaintiff:
Ramona L. Simpson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Johnson & Johnson, Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Hodge v. Simpson
as 7:2013cv00005
Petitioner:
Benny Lee Hodge
Respondent:
Thomas L. Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Smith v. Beshear et al
as 5:2012cv00092
Plaintiff:
Herbert R. Smith
Defendant:
Steven L. Beshear, LaDonna Thompson, Thomas L. Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 0:2012cv00044
Plaintiff:
Swana L. Simpson
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation, Microvasive, Inc., C.R. Bard, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simpson v. Jones et al
as 5:2011cv00422
Petitioner:
Charles L. Simpson
Respondent:
J. Jones and Woodford Co. Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Blair v. Simpson
as 5:2009cv00158
Petitioner:
James Blair
Respondent:
Thomas L. Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fuqua v. Simpson et al
as 5:2009cv00131
Plaintiff:
DeMarcus Fuqua
Defendant:
Thomas L. Simpson, Michael Ray and Bobby Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Jisis et al
as 5:2009cv00122
Petitioner:
Claude Cox
Respondent:
Byron Jisis and Thomas L. Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.