Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Brown et al v. Douglas Capital Management LLC et al
as 1:2021cv01139
Plaintiff:
Brown Trust-dated Clinton & Cristina Brown Trustees and Clinton W Brown
Defendant:
Douglas Capital Management LLC and Brett L Douglas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Justin Douglas v. Samantha Schwartz-Oscar, et al
as 20-3489
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JUSTIN L. DOUGLAS
Defendant / Appellee:
SAMANTHA SCHWARTZ-OSCAR, AMY ZIRBEL, Doctor, JAY VAN LANEN and others
CALLAHAN et al v. MILLER et al
as 1:2019cv03908
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORPORATION, AMANDA COPELAND and BRANDON MILLER
Plaintiff:
Q. WELLS, R. PEACHER, J. CALLAHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas, Danny v. Park Hotel et al
as 3:2018cv00281
Plaintiff:
Danny L. Douglas
Defendant:
Park Hotel, Permier Best Western, Sloopy Bar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DOUGLAS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2018cv00553
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND L. DOUGLAS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Douglas, Danny v. Amtrack, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00387
Plaintiff:
Danny L. Douglas
Defendant:
Amtrack, Inc., Amtrack Police, LaCrosse Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas, Danny v. Kwik Trip, Onlaska, WI et al
as 3:2017cv00386
Plaintiff:
Danny L. Douglas
Defendant:
Kwik Trip, Onlaska, WI, Kwik Trip, LaCrosse, WI, King Street Kitchen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas, Danny v. Porch Light et al
as 3:2017cv00385
Plaintiff:
Danny L. Douglas
Defendant:
Porch Light "men shelter, Percey and Roger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00110
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
DOUGLAS v. USA
as 1:2016cv01547
Petitioner:
DEANDRE L. DOUGLAS
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
