Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Gerald Bollfrass, et al v. City of Phoenix, et al
as 22-16485
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GERALD BOLLFRASS and FRANK CZYZEWSKI, a married couple
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF PHOENIX, a municipal corporation, PHOENIX HOUSING DEPARTMENT, named as The City of Phoenix Housing Department, a federally funded public housing program, DINA FERNANDEZ, an individual and others
Mills v. Roderick et al
as 1:2022cv02452
Plaintiff:
Albert Curtis Mills
Defendant:
R. Roderick, W. Hill, F. Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hogan v. Gorman et al
as 2:2022cv14328
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Hogan
Defendant:
Gorman, Hamm, Randt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hogan v. Gorman et al
as 2:2022cv14260
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Hogan
Defendant:
Gorman, Hamm, Randt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Iser et al
as 1:2022cv01691
Plaintiff:
Albert Curtis Mills
Defendant:
Major W. Iser, Lt. Thomas, Commissioner O. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
McCurdy v. US Ecology, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01685
Plaintiff:
Teresa McCurdy
Defendant:
US Ecology, Inc., Richard Burke, E. Renae Conley and others
Whitfield v. US Ecology, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01515
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
US Ecology, Inc., Richard Burke, E. Renae Conley and others
BAKER v. US ECOLOGY, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01053
Plaintiff:
LEWIS D BAKER
Defendant:
US ECOLOGY, INC., RICHARD BURKE, E. RENAE CONLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
O'Dell v. US Ecology, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02131
Plaintiff:
Ryan O'Dell
Defendant:
US Ecology, Inc., E. Renae Conley, Katina Dorton and others
Pizzaro v. US Ecology, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02144
Plaintiff:
Ray Pizzaro
Defendant:
US Ecology, Inc., Richard Burke, E. Renae Conley and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
