Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Cedar Coal Company v. DOWCP
as 24-1063
Petitioner:
CEDAR COAL COMPANY
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and ROGER L. MULLINS
Mullins v. Graham et al
as 4:2023cv00881
Plaintiff:
Sharda L. Mullins
Defendant:
C. Graham, B Caver, S. Sprabary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mullins v Graham et al
as 4:2023cv01004
Plaintiff:
Sharda L. Mullins
Defendant:
Sergeant C. Graham, Chief Deputy B. Caver, S. Sprabary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MULLINS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11506
Plaintiff:
WALTER L MULLINS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mullins v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2022cv05045
Plaintiff:
Teddy L. Mullins
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mullins v. Monsanto Company
as 0:2022cv01987
Plaintiff:
Teddy L. Mullins
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
David Meyers v. B. Dye
as 22-6785
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
B. DYE, R. BISHOP, S. YOUNG and others
Meyers v. Dye et al
as 7:2022cv00298
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Defendant:
B. Dye, R. Bishop, S. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervrain et al v. Rushing et al
as 2:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain and Medgine Sarah Jean
Defendant:
Karen E. Rushing, Todd Newton, Jeffrey R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Baltas v. Cook
as 22-65
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Joe Baltas
Defendant / Appellee:
Rollin Cook, In His Individual and Official Capacities, a Connecticut DOC employee
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, In His Individual and Official Capacities, Allen, In His Individual and Official Capacities, Little, In His Individual and Official Capacities and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
