Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00149
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00087
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00867
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Concepcion v. Oddo et al
as 3:2017cv02171
Petitioner:
Alberto Concepcion
Respondent:
L. Oddo, D Ortiz and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mega v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2016cv01404
Plaintiff:
Jesus Meza, Jr.
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, L. Oddo, Heath and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Beckwith et al v. Valencick et al
as 3:2016cv01232
Plaintiff:
Timothy L Beckwith and Jeremy V. Pinson
Defendant:
S. Valencick, Sis Hicks, SIA Heath and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jamaal Lewis v. L. J. Oddo
as 16-6170
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMAAL LEWIS
Respondent - Appellee:
L. ODDO, Warden
Washington v. Oddo et al
as 2:2015cv00068
Defendant:
L. Oddo, E. A. Earwin, K. Lane and others
Plaintiff:
Edward R. Washington, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eunice Husband v. Harrell Watt
as 11-6771
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUNICE HUSBAND
Defendant - Appellee:
HARRELL WATTS, Administrator, National Inmate Appeals; individual capacity, K. M. WHITE, Regional Director, Mid-Atlantic Regional Office; individual capacity, JOE D. DRIVER, Warden, United States Penitentiary-Hazelton; individual capacity and others
Shawn Phillips v. Joe Driver
as 10-6115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN A. PHILLIPS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE D. DRIVER, Warden, L. ODDO, Captain, MR. ANTONELLIE, SIS Lieutenant and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
