Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Phelps-Roper et al v. St. Charles, Missouri, City of
as 4:2011cv00111
Plaintiff:
Shirley L. Phelps-Roper and Megan Phelps-Roper
Defendant:
St. Charles, Missouri, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelps-Roper et al v. St. Charles, Missouri
as 4:2010cv02232
Plaintiff:
Shirley L. Phelps-Roper and Megan Phelps-Roper
Defendant:
County of St. Charles, Missouri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelps-Roper v. Bullock
as 4:2010cv01125
Plaintiff:
Shirley L. Phelps-Roper
Defendant:
Daniel R. Bullock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelps v. United States of America
as 4:2009cv01661
Petitioner:
Kelly L. Phelps
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Phelps-Roper v. City of Manchester, Missouri
as 4:2009cv01298
Plaintiff:
Shirley L. Phelps-Roper
Defendant:
Manchester, Missouri, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phelps-Roper et al v. Pevely, Missouri, City of
as 4:2009cv01299
Plaintiff:
Shirley L. Phelps-Roper and Shirley L. Phelps-Roper
Defendant:
Pevely, Missouri, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phelps-Roper v. Ballwin, Missouri, City of
as 4:2009cv01295
Plaintiff:
Shirley L. Phelps-Roper
Defendant:
Ballwin, Missouri, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phelps-Roper v. Charlack, City of, Missouri
as 4:2009cv01297
Defendant:
Charlack, City of, Missouri
Plaintiff:
Shirley L. Phelps-Roper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phelps-Roper v. Berkeley, Missouri, City of
as 4:2009cv01296
Defendant:
Berkeley, Missouri, City of
Plaintiff:
Shirley L. Phelps-Roper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phelps-Roper v. Riverview,Village of
as 4:2009cv01082
Plaintiff:
Shirley L. Phelps-Roper
Defendant:
Riverview,Village of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
