Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Scott et al v. City of Springfield et al
as 3:2018cv30009
Plaintiff:
Timothy Scott, Sylvia Scott and Frederick L. Scott
Defendant:
City of Springfield, Witman Properties and COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv30181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Fox v. Town of Framingham et al
as 1:2014cv10337
Plaintiff:
Kevin Fox
Defendant:
Town of Framingham, Michael Welch, Jeffrey Convery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mulcahy v. McHugh et al
as 1:2013cv12593
Plaintiff:
Mr. Shane Mulcahy
Defendant:
John M McHugh and Maj. Gen. L. Scott Rice
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1552 Armed Forces: Action to Correct Records
Holt et al v. Golden et al
as 3:2011cv30200
Plaintiff:
Frank Holt and Norman Hart
Defendant:
Michael F. Golden, Amaro Goncalves, P. James Debney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nance et al v. Golden et al
as 3:2011cv30018
Plaintiff:
Dwight Nance and Art Bundy
Defendant:
Michael F. Golden , John A Kelly , Barry M Monheit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sarnacki v. Golden et al
as 3:2011cv30009
Plaintiff:
Aaron Sarnacki
Defendant:
Michael F Golden , John A Kelly , Barry M Monheit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nance v. Golden et al
as 3:2009cv30177
Plaintiff:
Dwight Nance
Defendant:
Michael F. Golden, John A. Kelly, Barry M. Monheit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Bundy v. Golden, et al
as 3:2009cv30174
Plaintiff:
Art Bundy
Defendant:
Michael F. Golden, John A. Kelly, Barry M. Monheit and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Scott v. U.S. Homeland Security
as 1:2009cv10673
Plaintiff:
Toussaint L. Scott
Defendant:
U.S. Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
