Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Anthony Hoover El v. State of North Carolina
as 24-6228
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER EL
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and JUDGE L. TODD BURKE
TYLER v. SMITH et al
as 1:2023cv00650
Plaintiff:
XAVAR TYLER
Defendant:
DAVID B. SMITH, THE FORSYTH COUNTY L.E.D.C, ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anthony Hoover El v. State of North Carolina
as 21-7640
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER EL
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, JASH STAINS, NC Attorney General, L. TODD BURKE, Superior Court Judge and others
Hoover El v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2021ct03039
Defendant:
David Hall, State of North Carolina, L. Todd Burke and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Leon Hoover El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. KIMBROUGH et al
as 1:2020cv00543
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.
Defendant:
LANCE CUNNINGHAM, UNIT MANAGER MILES KIVETT, CAPTAIN B. WARREN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Hoover v. Unnamed Defendant
as 19-7623
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY LEON HOOVER
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN R. LIEBMAN, L. TODD BURKE, JOSH STEIN and others
Hoover v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2019ct03076
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hoover
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant, Clerk's Office, Barry H. Bloch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. SETTLE et al
as 1:2019cv00291
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.
Defendant:
NURSE WILLIAMS, K. ADAMS, B. F. KIMBROUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. BAILEY et al
as 1:2019cv00287
Defendant:
K. ADAMS, UNKNOWN NAMED WHITE MALE FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGIST, MILES KIVETT and others
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TUCKER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TUCKER v. BAILEY et al
as 1:2019cv00277
Defendant:
FORSYTH COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT., SMITH/KEEFE COMMISSARY/PROVIDER, CATRINA THOMPSON and others
Plaintiff:
CORNELIUS TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
