Cases
Cases 31 - 38 of 38
NORINGTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01095
Defendant: COMMISSIONER EDWIN G. BUSS, GOVERNOR MITCH E. DANIELS, JR., INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Plaintiff: LAKESHA NORINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Lakesha Norington v. Mitchell Daniels, Jr., et al
as 11-2681
Plaintiff - Appellant: LAKESHA NORINGTON, also known as SHANTRELL MARCEL NORINGTON
Defendant - Appellee: MITCHELL E. DANIELS, JR., Governor, EDWIN G. BUSS, Commissioner IDOC, WILLIAM K. WILSON, Superintendent, Indiana State Prison and others
Norington v. Daniels et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00282
Plaintiff: Lakesha Norington
Defendant: Mitchell E Daniels, Indiana Attorney General, Edwin G Buss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lakesha Norington v. Mark Levenhagen
as 11-2092
Petitioner - Appellant: LAKESHA NORINGTON, also known as Shawntrell Norington
Respondent - Appellee: MARK E. LEVENHAGEN, Superintendent
Norington v. Daniels et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2011cv00125
Plaintiff: Lakesha Norington
Defendant: Mitchell E Daniels, Jr, Edwin G Buss, Attorney General of the State of Indiana and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norington v. Draper et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00473
Plaintiff: Lakesha Norington
Defendant: H Draper, McNeil, Lauran Crohan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NORINGTON v. FINNAN
as 1:2010cv00933
Respondent: ALAN FINNAN
Petitioner: LAKESHA NORINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NORINGTON v. FINNAN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00477
Respondent: ALAN FINNAN
Petitioner: Ms. LAKESHA NORINGTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?