Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Lakeview Loan Servicing LLC et al v. Smith
as 8:2019cv02636
Plaintiff:
Mortgage Firm Inc. and Lakeview Loan Servicing LLC
Defendant:
Theron Steven Smith
Liveoak v. Loancare LLC et al
as 2:2019cv01641
Defendant:
Lakeview Loan Servicing LLC and Loancare LLC
Plaintiff:
Thomas Blake Liveoak
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Price v. Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC
as 2:2019cv00655
Plaintiff:
Gregory C. Price
Defendant:
Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lloyd v. Lakeview Loan Servicing LLC et al
as 2:2019cv01312
Defendant:
M & T Bank, Lakeview Loan Servicing LLC, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Cretest Theodore Lloyd
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Jackson et al v. Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC
as 6:2019cv00761
Plaintiff:
Linda Jackson and Henry W. Jackson
Defendant:
Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv02637
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC v. Garvich
as 3:2018cv00111
Plaintiff:
Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC
Defendant:
Randy Garvich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2018cv00820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SACKALY v. FLAGSTAR BANK FSB, et al
as 3:2018cv00012
Plaintiff:
SONGKANE SACKALY
Defendant:
FLAGSTAR BANK FSB and LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
VRM (VENDOR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT) v. Lewis et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG2)
as 3:2017cv00302
Plaintiff:
VRM (VENDOR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT)
Defendant:
Spencer Lewis and Jamila Lewis
Counter_defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. , Cenlar Agency, Inc. , Lakeview Loan Servicing, LLC and others
Counter_claimant:
Jamila Lewis and Spencer Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
