Cases 1 - 10 of 348
Cannon v. Peterson
as 2:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lamar Cannon
Defendant:
E Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Renee Stingley, et al v. Laci Transport Inc., et al
as 24-1612
Plaintiff:
RENEE STINGLEY, EARNEST SMITH, JELTHER SEPT and others
Defendant:
LACI TRANSPORT INC. and VLADETA MARKOVIC, individually
Eddrell Scott v. Aryana Moss, et al
as 24-1479
Plaintiff:
EDDRELL SCOTT
Defendant:
ARYANA M. MOSS and AKILAH LAMAR
Calvin v. Carter et al
as 2:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Jamon Lamar Calvin and Jaman Aaron Swope
Defendant:
Olivia Carter, Christina Lewis and Wisconsin Department of Probation and Parole
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WEBB v. MCCAFFERTY et al
as 1:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
MERLE ROSS WEBB
Defendant:
KELLY MCCAFFERTY, ARAYANNA MOSS and AKILAH LAMAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Mellem et al
as 2:2024cv00145
Plaintiff:
Lamar Anderson
Defendant:
Sgt Mellem, CO Johnston, CO Bemish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamar Pettus v. L'Oreal USA Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00924
Plaintiff:
Rosie Lamar Pettus
Defendant:
LOreal USA Inc., LOreal USA Products Inc., SoftSheen- Carson LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Harris v. Jewell
as 2:2024cv00141
Petitioner:
Steven Lamar Harris
Respondent:
Chantell Jewell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
SHANNON v. SHAFFER et al
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
DANTAVIS LAMARCUS SHANNON
Defendant:
SHAFFER, REGAL, MCCAFFERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRIER v. LAMAR et al
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
JACOB C. BRIER
Defendant:
AKILAH LAMAR, JACKSON, MCCAFFERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
