Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Johnson v. Ma'at
as 2:2022cv00571
Plaintiff:
Eddie Lamar Johnson
Defendant:
Warden Ma'at
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
USA v. Johnson
as 21-51189
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Dominique Lamar Johnson, also known as D. J.
Johnson v. Williams et al
as 3:2021cv00088
Defendant:
Officer Unknown Smiley, Lt. Unknown McElroy, Captain Unknown Williams and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Carvis Lamar Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Holensworth et al
as 3:2020cv00600
Defendant:
Lee Perry Jamie, Officer Brett McAlpin, Officer James Ray Born and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Carvis Lamar Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Hicks et al
as 3:2020cv00501
Defendant:
Lt. Barnett, Officer Morre, McQueary Jordan and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Carvis Lamar Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Bridges et al
as 3:2020cv00328
Defendant:
Officer Unknown Breedlode, Officer Unknown Chaplain and Sgt. Unknown Bridges
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Carvis Lamar Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Bramlett et al
as 3:2020cv00204
Defendant:
Rebecca N. Boyd, John K. Bramlett, Matthew A. Baldridge and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Carvis Lamar Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson vs. Bailey
as 3:2020cv00117
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Carvis Lamar Johnson
Defendant:
Sheriff Bryant Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Vaugh et al
as 3:2020cv00104
Defendant:
Sgt. Unknown Hicks, Winston, Johnthen Walker and others
Plaintiff:
Carvis Lamar Johnson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
