Cases 31 - 40 of 106
BRYANT v. CAMPBELL et al
as 4:2013cv00426
Plaintiff:
GENERAL ARNEZ BRYANT, III
Defendant:
LARRY CAMPBELL, ALAN GRINER, C DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-13036
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
COLLINS v. CAMPBELL et al
as 4:2013cv00374
Plaintiff:
CLAIRE ANTHONY COLLINS
Defendant:
LARRY CAMPBELL, TAMER MORGHEM and CORIZON HEALTH INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCCRAY v. CAMPBELL et al
as 4:2013cv00355
Plaintiff:
MYRON MCCRAY
Defendant:
LARRY CAMPBELL, BRENT COUGHIN, CHARLES DODSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEIER v. MEGGS et al
as 2:2013cv11921
Plaintiff:
Daniel L Meier
Defendant:
William M Meggs, George S Reynolds, LARRY CAMPBELL and others
MEIER v. MEGGS et al
as 1:2013cv00496
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L. MEIER
Defendant:
WILLIAM M. MEGGS, GEORGE S. REYNOLDS, LARRY CAMPBELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Darnell Mitchell
as 13-5288
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DARNELL MITCHELL, aka Darnell D. Mitchell, aka Michael Jones, aka Michael D. Jones, aka Larry Jones, aka Larry Campbell
ANTHONY v. CAMPBELL
as 4:2013cv00045
Petitioner:
ANTONIO ANTHONY
Respondent:
LARRY CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RODRIGUEZ v. CAMPBELL et al
as 4:2012cv00596
Plaintiff:
ANDESLAY RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
LARRY CAMPBELL, DENNIS JONES, GEORGE STINSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell et al v. Roane Transportation Services, LLC et al
as 6:2012cv00211
Plaintiff:
Larry Campbell and Wanda Campbell
Defendant:
Roane Transportation Services, LLC and Ricky Flournoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
