Cases 1 - 10 of 100
LaRue v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
as 4:2026cv05977
Plaintiff:
Melaney LaRue
Defendant:
UNUM Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Johnson v. UNITED STATES
as 1:2026cv07913
Plaintiff:
Sharon Y. Johnson
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and Shirley Williams-LaRue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Watson v. Leavenworth County Jail et al
as 5:2026cv03215
Plaintiff:
Arthur Larue Watson, III
Defendant:
Leavenworth County Jail, Leavenworth County Attorney's Office, Leavenworth Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
USA v. Talli McFadden
as 26-2382
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
TALLI J. MCFADDEN, also known as LARUE MCFADDEN
Rose v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2026pq00637
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
David Larue Rose
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Does 1 through 60 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ware v. Boyles et al
as 4:2026cv00654
Plaintiff:
Supastar Ware
Defendant:
John Boyles, John Edwards, Jane French and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv03568
Plaintiff:
James Rice, Adrian Concha, Alan Barker and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ware v. Missouri Dept of Corrections et al
as 4:2026cv00618
Plaintiff:
Supastar Ware
Defendant:
Missouri Dept of Corrections, John Boyles, John LaRue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ware v. LaRue et al
as 4:2026cv00592
Plaintiff:
Supastar Ware
Defendant:
John LaRue, Jane Mosier, John Hartel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.